Archive forAugust, 2006

MIKE AGAR replies to FRANCES WALLACE re: Complexity & Travel-Planning

Another ABM option would be to drop the four agents randomly onto Manhattan and have them wander one block at a time in random directions until one of them found a place to sleep at which point diffusion along network links would lead to a convergence unless another agent along the way found something better, in which case convergence would aim there, etc.

You all would probably wind up in a camp under the FDR expressway, but at least it would meet the price constraint.

Mike

Comments

Leadership in the Service of Early Childhood Mental Health

This is a great article published by the Zero to Three Policy Center on the ways in which community- and state-level leaders can facilitate systems change efforts to nurture the mental health of infants, toddlers and young children: “Advocacy Strategies to Improve Outcomes for Young Children: Interviews with Leaders at the State and Community Levels. “.

Comments

Exploitation of Youth & Families: Perspectives on Unregulated Residential Treatment

The following is the summary submitted to the APA Press Office to announce our symposium presentation at the 2006 Convention of the American Psychological Association in New Orleans:

****************************************************************************

Exploitation of Youth & Families: Perspectives on Unregulated Residential Treatment

Allison Pinto, Ph.D.
Monica Epstein, Ph.D.
Paul Lewis, B.B.A.
Kathryn Whitehead, B.A.

August 12, 2006
APA Convention 2006

On August 10, 2006, the American Psychological Association issued a statement reaffirming its unequivocal position against torture and abuse. APA President Gerald P. Koocher, Ph.D., stated, “Our intention is to empower and encourage members to do everything they can to prevent violations of basic human rights – at Guantanamo Bay or anywhere else they may occur. It is not enough for us to express outrage or to codify acceptable practices. As psychologists, we must use every means at our disposal to prevent abuse and other forms of cruel or degrading treatment (APA Press Release, August 10, 2006).”

This presentation focuses on mistreatment, abuse and human rights violations that youth have been experiencing in unregulated residential treatment facilities in states across the U.S., and calls for psychologists to actively respond in order to safeguard and protect youth and their families from mistreatment at the hands of U.S. owned and operated companies and programs.

To place the current concerns in context: Note that it is now illegal to use any of the following practices with regard to the treatment of U.S. detainees in Guantanamo Bay and other facilities:
o Use of phobias & fears to induce stress
o Physical training (forced calisthenics)
o Exposure to cold weather
o Sleep Deprivation
o Nutritional Deprivation
o Slapping face or stomach
o Stress positions (e.g. prolonged standing)
o Isolation greater than 30 days
o Forced Labor
o Denial of Use of Bathroom

However, each of these practices is being used to “modify the behavior” of U.S. adolescents in unregulated, private residential facilities, in the name of “therapeutic” schooling and programming.

Dr. Monica Epstein will provide an overview of the phenomena of unregulated residential treatment for youth. She will describe the private industry of residential programs that has flourished over the past 10-15 years, claiming to meet the needs of children with emotional and behavioral problems and their families. Marketing themselves as therapeutic boarding schools, emotional growth programs, and wilderness programs, among other labels, these programs offer an “innovative alternative” to families in crisis. In many states, these programs are not required to meet state licensing requirements for the residential mental health care they provide because they are not publicly funded or because they self-identify as schools rather than mental health treatment programs.

Highly disturbing reports have been published in the public media describing harsh discipline, inappropriate seclusion and restraint, substandard psychotherapeutic interventions conducted by unqualified staff, medical and nutritional neglect, and rights violations.

Kathryn Whitehead, B.A., will provide a first-hand account of her experience as an adolescent who attended an unregulated residential facility, where she experienced forced labor, exposure to extreme environmental conditions, mandatory exercise, humiliation, and patient as well as human rights violations. She will also share quotes illustrating the experiences of other youth who have recently responded to an online survey conducted by Allison Pinto, Ph.D., Whitehead, and colleagues at the University of South Florida to clarify the experience of adolescence in residential facilities. Youth experiences, in their own words, include:

o They “scared me into submission… I felt I was entering a teen prison…”
o “…had to get naked and squat while turning around in circles…”
o “I was made to get naked and humiliated- do jumping jacks…”
o “They didn’t talk to me like a human or try to comfort me as I cried…”
o “Physical activity was endless…it was meant to break us…”
o “Sleep deprivation in the longer 3-5 day workshops accompanied by very cold room temp. and carefully chosen music played at high volumes, was at times agonizing…”
o Newer students “were denied sleep until the older students were satisfied with the newcomers ‘progress’ each evening…”
o “Girls peed themselves…”
o “Many times I was hungry after I ate and couldn’t get more food…”
o “They treated us like we had no rights…we had no locks on the bathroom…staff would watch us dress, shower and sometimes even use the toilet…”
o “Some people were in isolation for months, lying on their stomach eating out of a bowl…”
o “The room was 7×7 feet, it was always cold…I remember screaming a lot…when I wasn’t, I would curl up in a ball in the corner and sing to myself…”
o “I was sexually abused while in restraints…”
o “I was pepper sprayed…”
o “My therapist stood behind me and whispered things about my rape, while playing the song I was raped to, for 4 consecutive groups sessions…”
o “At times we were forced to eat our food in the ‘push up position’ like dogs…”
o “I broke my finger while in the program and was not allowed to go to the doctor…”
o “I tried telling my parents what actually going on at that place, I was severely disciplined and my parents were told I was being manipulative…I was only telling the truth”
o “I still wake up with nightmares…”

Paul Lewis, B.B.S., will provide a first-hand account of his family’s experience with unregulated residential programming. The Lewis’ sent their 14-year-old son to a wilderness program where his rights were denied and he was mistreated, leading to his death. Mr. Lewis will explain that the intent in enrolling his son was to help improve his self esteem, learn strategies to deal with his depression and earn the necessary credits to complete 8th grade. Once enrolled, his son was not allowed to communicate with his parents, and when his parents called each day to inquire about how he was doing, they were told he was fine and assured he would be safe. They only found out later that this was not the case. On the sixth day in the program the Lewis’ son slashed his arm four times with a program supplied pocketknife; he then approached the adults in charge and told them, “Take this away from me before I hurt myself any more, I can’t take it any more. I want to call my Mom and I want to go home”. The next day the head therapist, who was not trained as a therapist, decided their son was just trying to manipulate them to get out of the program and go home, so he ignored their son’s cry for help. That night, their son hung himself only several feet from his makeshift campsite.

Allison Pinto, Ph.D. will present preliminary findings from an online survey of young adults who participated in residential programs as adolescents. She will report findings based on information from the 162 respondents who described their experience in 36 programs in 17 states labeled as therapeutic boarding schools, emotional growth academies, and behavior modification programs (as opposed to licensed residential treatment centers), in which they had no opportunity to contact an advocate if they had concerns or complaints while attending the program. Preliminary findings reveal that “patient” rights violations, inhumane treatment and abuse were reported by many youth.

With regard to “patient” rights violations, 120 youth reported that their rights were never described to them upon admission, 125 reported that their calls were monitored, 123 had letters monitored, and 114 indicated their conversations or letters were filtered or interrupted.

In terms of the violations of patients’ rights to least restrictive intervention, 82 experienced seclusion and 42 experienced restraint, and these interventions were often prompted not only by evidence of danger to self or others, but rather breaking a program rule (N = 90), saying something disrespectful (N = 68), cursing (N = 62), making a face (N = 42), or talking out of turn (N = 40).

Program practices reflective of inhumane treatment were reported by many youth, in terms of forced labor (N = 92), denial of access to bathrooms (N = 87), scare tactics (N = 84), excessive exercise (N = 75), exposure to elements — extreme heat or cold (N = 74), sleep deprivation (N = 61), nutritional deprivation (N = 51), and physical punishment (N = 36).

Furthermore, 76 individuals reported that they were emotionally, physically or sexually abused by the staff.

In response to participation in residential programming, 57 individuals endorsed items consistent with a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, although only 2 individuals indicated that they had received a diagnosis of PTSD prior to program participation.

Of the 118 individuals who provided feedback regarding their satisfaction with the program, 90 reported that they would not recommend the program to others.

These findings will be discussed in terms of urgent needs to:
o Increase family awareness
o Increase professional/system awareness
o Increase protections within programs
o Increase protections within states (with regard to licensing/regulating, suspected child abuse reporting, and protection & advocacy)
o Conduct research / evaluation
o Provide resources & supports for youth & families who have been harmed

Comments

Another Take on Wikipedia…this one’s in the New Yorker

Here’s what Stacy Schiff has to say in the New Yorker, in her article titled, “KNOW IT ALL: Can Wikipedia conquer expertise?”.

Comments

FRANCES WALLACE on Complexity & Travel-Planning

Hi all-
Dean has encouraged me to share an email that I recently sent to 3 companions who will be traveling to NYC with me on Labor Day weekend. I was tasked with finding accommodations for us (rather last minute) that would allow all four us to stay in the same room or hotel. This has not been easy and I am now utterly frustrated with the “needs” of the group. My response to my companions is below…

I have to get practical application of complexity somewhere! Maybe, I do need some time off….:)

******
FRANCES Writes:
I am doing my best to meet the requirements of the group given the following parameters (or as in complexity theory, the function of the system and the simple rules):

FUNCTION: Obtain NYC accommodations that would enable all 4 travelers to obtain shelter in the same room and/or building.

RULES:
1) Price range needs cannot exceed $265 for the weekend
2) A decent neighborhood
3) Access to bathrooms (some are ok with shared others want private)
4) Travelers must collaborate

So given the above simple rules, we are left with a few options.

1) We can abide by our simple rules and adapt our behaviors and schema to reach optimal fitness on our current system fitness landscape.

2) We can collectively decide to alter one of the above rules thus adjusting the system fitness landscape to fit our current behaviors and schema.

3) Choose not to adapt our behavior/schema nor the simple rules, increase anxiety, back away from collaboration, spiral into chaos, stagnate in a fitness valley instead of reaching a fitness peak, and have no place to stay when we arrive in NYC.

4) Change the function of the system to reflect the following:

Obtain NYC accommodations that would enable at least 2 travelers to obtain shelter in the same room and/or building.

RESPONSE FROM ONE COMPANION:
I have no idea what any of it means, I just need a place to sleep but, preferably with carpet…

FRANCES’ RESPONSE:
Your preference for carpet would indicate a recessive or shadow rule operating behind the scenes of the legitimate rules that have been established by the system. If your expression of the Carpet rule resonates with others, it may reach a tipping point of agreement through positive feedback processes and therefore become a part of the dominant/legitimate system. If however, your expression is not supported by others and suppressed through negative feedback processes it will remain recessive. At that point, you will have three options:

1) Conform to the system as is in behavior only. (Meaning that you will be OK with a room with no carpet, sleep on the floor but complain the whole time).

2) Conform to the system in both behavioral and schema change. (Meaning that you have heard the comments of the group regarding the unnecessary need for carpet and you have agreed and alter your behavior accordingly; thus learning has taken place).

3) In the fight between conformity and individualism, the need to be an individual wins. (Meaning, you say to hell with us all, execute free will, buck the system, and seek out carpeting).

Frances Wallace, MPH
National Implementation Research Network
Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute
University of South Florida

Comments

Another Take on Wikipedia & Complexity

Check out Jaron Lanier’s take on Wikipedia in his essay, “DIGITAL MAOISM: The Hazards of the New Online Collectivism.”.

Comments

Wikipedia & Complexity

Turns other folks are posting about Wikipedia as it relates to complexity too…check out this entertaining tale by David Snowden!

Comments

Foray into Blogging…

At the encouragement of Jonathan Wilson, one of our resident communications gurus here at FMHI, I am venturing into the world of faculty blogs. This is a first attempt to use this virtual space to share some thoughts and resources relating to some of the hot topics in children’s mental health, starting with a focus on the application of complexity theory/science. Eager to see what comes of this… we shall see…

Comments

Complexity Brownbag: August 17, 2006

WHAT EMERGED…

In today’s brownbag, Catherine Newman noted that it would be helpful to clarify and articulate a response to this nagging question: “Complex systems thinking vs. systems thinking: So what’s the difference?” Several folks offered their take on some of the differences, tracking the evolution of systems thinking from general systems theory through cybernetics and up to ideas about complex adaptive systems. The shift in thinking from the goal of maintenance/restoration of equilibrium/homeostasis to the goal of goodness-of-fit with the environment in a given moment (such that chaos might at times be the very state that is adaptive) was touched upon. Links to family systems theories were offered as well, tying the conversation to child/family mental health. We didn’t get into some of the complexity notions that move “beyond complex adaptive systems,” such as Stacey’s focus on complex responsive processes, but that’s for another day… The question of whether there are questions/issues that are still better addressed using systems theories other than complexity theory was raised as well, to be chewed on some more…

Some very interesting discussion occurred today regarding the application of complexity theory to information and knowledge systems, as related to the evolution and adaptation of human systems. Doug Uzzell mentioned a recent article in the Atlantic Monthly about the way Wikipedia has evolved–a phenomenon whereby anyone can contribute what they know about a given topic, and everyone can then edit what is entered. Turns out it yields information as accurate as some of the traditional encyclopedias. Bruce Neubauer noted that it raises issues about democracy as it relates to the web…people need the opportunity to express themselves, but also not be overwhelmed by thousands of perspectives. Sheryl Stire tied this idea to issues regarding the participation of faculty and staff within departments at FMHI. Gary Burge spoke about specialized websites like DIG, where references rise to the top if one person says “this is a good thing” and others say “I agree.” Rich Puddy raised the issue of ethics…what if something is popular and many people say it is a good thing, yet there is evidence that it is in fact harmful? The example raised was the current phenomenon of unregulated residential facilities for youth. Ilene Berson noted that there has been a response within the academic community regarding Wikepedia–a chastising of researchers who reference this source, as it is perceived to be insufficiently rigorous. The question was raised: What might change if university policies encouraged faculty members to contribute their expertise to the evolution of Wikipedia & similar sources, to submit to online journals, and to post blogs? Bruce referenced a recent paper he wrote, in which he proposed that knowledge might be generated much differently if we said, “let’s let the documents interact with each other…” Knowledge might be generated very differently if there were more “volleying,” and more iterative cycles. This fit with a comment Gary Burge made: “Could institutions become the stewards of thought threads that are evolving, rather than institutions for the storage of knowledge documents?” It would likely shift the dynamics relating to knowledge, power and control…as someone said, the surest sign that Wikipedia is effective is that people now want to legislate against it! Very intriguing ideas, as far as I’m concerned…but all this makes me a bit self-conscious writing up this summary! (So those of you who were present: Please revise as needed for optimal accuracy!)

The brownbag ended on an existential note…Doug said, “What would a non-linear description look like? Probably like good poetry…constantly emerging as you go through it…” Bruce noted that Taoism and the I Ching seem like an early expression of the things we are talking about, and Doug offered a related reference: Katya Walter’s book, The Tao of Chaos, available through Amazon.com. We will try to recruit a Taoist to join the brownbag…

WHAT’S NEXT…

Next week, Mike Agar will be joining us, and will serve as the monthly brownbag speaker. To prepare, the group plans to read Mike’s recent E: CO article, “Telling it like you think it might be: Narrative, linguistic anthropology, and complex organization,” which can be accessed at: http://www.ethknoworks.com/files/Eco_article.pdf

Additional readings for those of us who have turned this into our hobby include:

“An Anthropological Problem, A Complex Solution” by Mike Agar in Human Organization

“Scholarly journals as web services: automated scholarship, memes and cyberactive articles” by Bruce Neubauer in Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, which can be accessed at http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=767628&jmp=abstract&coll=ACM&dl=ACM&CFID=1588875&CFTOKEN=96544800#abstract

“The Hive” by Marshall Poe in the Atlantic Monthly, which can be accessed at http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200609/wikipedia

Hope to see you next Thursday at noon…remember: it’s a brownbag, so bring your lunch!

Comments

Complexity Brownbag: August 10, 2006

Here is the email message that was sent out by Melissa Van Dyke summarizing the August 10 Complexity Brownbag:

*************************************************************************************

Hello!

It was enjoyable to spend lunch with all of you!

Here are a few of the ideas that came up today about future gatherings. . .

–It might be nice to have a speaker about once a month who presented on some topic related to complexity and CAS
–The sharing of resources is helpful. It is nice to be able to swap articles and book titles based on individuals’ particular interests
–”It’s hard to come empty headed.” A “recommended reading” for the week might assist folks in feeling more comfortable and prepared to share their ideas; the readings would not be mandatory, just available for those who would like to read something that others may be reading

Many of you expressed interest in a couple of specific articles/resources:

NetLogo (Agent-Based Modeling software, tutorial, and library of examples): http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/

Article from the Atlantic Monthly, called Seeing Around Corners, that references the use of agent-based modeling

Article on Complexity Leadership Theory by Uhl-Bien, Marion & McKelvey

Oh, and here’s the quote for the week:

From the cardiologists’ perspective: Chaos is good. “A well heart dances; a sick heart marches.” — Steve Banks

Thanks for joining in the conversation; we look forward to hearing from you.

Melissa

Comments